I am starting to see green hair algae grow on the live rock so I started dosing AZ NO3 again as that killed off the algae growth with my previous algae issue. I also added more Chaetomorpha algae to the sump. Nitrates test at 0.2 mg/L (Salifert) and phosphates are 0.02 ppm (Hanna Checker).
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Sunday, April 17, 2016
40 Gallon Update
Everything is going great in my 40 gallon breeder. I just added a Jebao dosing pump to keep up with the alkalinity and calcium demands of the corals. Still no protein skimmer, just a 30 gallon sump full of live rock and chaeto lit by two PAR 38 flood lights!
Labels:
40 gallon breeder,
Jebao dosing pump,
pictures,
top down,
update
Saturday, April 16, 2016
Sunday, April 10, 2016
Sunday, April 3, 2016
Video Update (Acro's Added)
I added my premium acropora frags on April 2nd 2016.
Ricky's Poison Ivy
JF Fox Flame
RR Rainbow Loom
BC Banana Caroliniana
Purple Bonsai
Tyree Pink Lemonade
BC Rainbow in Spain
TCK Field of Dreams
ORA Hawkin's Echinata
BC Beehive 2.0
Labels:
120 Gallon,
acan,
acropora,
actinic,
ATI,
Azure Damsel,
Blastomussa,
Blenny,
Chevron Tang,
fish,
LPS,
McCosker's Wrasse,
metal halide,
Phoenix 14K,
Pintail Fairy Wrasse,
SPS,
Talbot's Damsel,
update,
video,
Yellow Tang
Sunday, February 28, 2016
40 Gallon Update
My display tank is making progress but here is an update on the corals I am growing for the display.
The tank is currently lit by an 8 bulb TEK T5 fixture. The bulb combo from front to back is as follows:
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Coral Plus
ATI Purple Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Coral Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Blue Plus
The tank does not have a protein skimmer, the sump is full of live rock and Chaetomorpha macro algae.
Labels:
40 gallon breeder,
acan,
frag tank,
frags,
LPS,
SPS frags,
T5,
TEK Fixture
Monday, February 1, 2016
PAR Readings Part III
My other Lumatek ballast went and I replaced it with another LuXcore and also a new Phoenix 14K bulb to compare the PAR to the Hamilton versus a 6 month old Phoenix bulb from the previous post. I still cannot run the LuXcore ballasts on a GFCI but I am not having issues with them firing up without being connected to the GFCI.
Results:
Phoenix 14K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 269 watts of power draw at 825 PAR
Standard setting - 256 watts of power draw at 775 PAR
One week old Hamilton
Hamilton 20K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 261 watts of power draw at 765 PAR
Standard setting - 249 watts of power draw at 720 PAR
The PAR measurements were taken 8" under the bottom of the reflector. The Phoenix has more of a white look when compared to the Hamilton. I wanted to have a bluer look than what I am used to without sacrificing PAR so I think I am going to run two Hamilton's over my tank. I have been running Phoenix 14K bulbs for the past 9 years and feel it is time for a change.
Results:
Phoenix 14K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 269 watts of power draw at 825 PAR
Standard setting - 256 watts of power draw at 775 PAR
One week old Hamilton
Hamilton 20K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 261 watts of power draw at 765 PAR
Standard setting - 249 watts of power draw at 720 PAR
The PAR measurements were taken 8" under the bottom of the reflector. The Phoenix has more of a white look when compared to the Hamilton. I wanted to have a bluer look than what I am used to without sacrificing PAR so I think I am going to run two Hamilton's over my tank. I have been running Phoenix 14K bulbs for the past 9 years and feel it is time for a change.
Labels:
Hamilton 20K,
kill a watt meter,
lighting,
Lumatek,
LuXcore,
par,
par meter,
Phoenix 14K,
Phoenix bulb,
wattage,
watts
Friday, January 22, 2016
PAR Readings Part II
I wanted to test out two other brands of metal halides as I have only ever ran Phoenix 14K bulbs for the past 9 years. I tested the redesigned Hamilton 20K blue bulb and the 20K Ushio. After firing them both up the Hamilton bulb is very blue, almost like Windex whereas the Phoenix 14K is more white with a hint of purple/blue. The Ushio bulb is noticeably dimmer and has much more of a purple look which is good for running Blue Plus T5's and the Phoenix/Hamilton would look good with pure Actinics. The Ushio was ran on the LuXcore ballast and the Hamilton was ran on the Lumatek & LuXcore ballast. I sent back the LuXcore ballast because it was tripping my GFCI so these results are with a new LuXcore ballast which does draw a little more power and will in turn produce more PAR.
Results:
Hamilton 20K on Lumatek ballast:
HQI Setting - 301 watts of power draw at 895 PAR
Standard setting - 278 watts of power draw at 815 PAR
Hamilton 20K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 271 watts of power draw at 770 PAR
Standard setting - 257 watts of power draw at 730 PAR
Ushio 20K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 271 watts of power draw at 580 PAR
Standard setting - 257 watts of power draw at 530 PAR
The PAR measurements were taken 8" under the bottom of the reflector.
Out of curiosity I put a 6 month old Phoenix bulb in the Lumatek & LuXcore ballast after the glass was cleaned and the PAR readings did increase from the original test on January 10th with dirty glass.
Phoenix 14K on Lumatek ballast:
HQI Setting - 301 watts of power draw at 820 PAR
Standard setting - 278 watts of power draw at 740 PAR
Phoenix 14K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 271 watts of power draw at 690 PAR
Standard setting - 257 watts of power draw at 645 PAR
Results:
Hamilton 20K on Lumatek ballast:
HQI Setting - 301 watts of power draw at 895 PAR
Standard setting - 278 watts of power draw at 815 PAR
Hamilton 20K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 271 watts of power draw at 770 PAR
Standard setting - 257 watts of power draw at 730 PAR
Ushio 20K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 271 watts of power draw at 580 PAR
Standard setting - 257 watts of power draw at 530 PAR
The PAR measurements were taken 8" under the bottom of the reflector.
Out of curiosity I put a 6 month old Phoenix bulb in the Lumatek & LuXcore ballast after the glass was cleaned and the PAR readings did increase from the original test on January 10th with dirty glass.
Phoenix 14K on Lumatek ballast:
HQI Setting - 301 watts of power draw at 820 PAR
Standard setting - 278 watts of power draw at 740 PAR
Phoenix 14K on LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 271 watts of power draw at 690 PAR
Standard setting - 257 watts of power draw at 645 PAR
Labels:
ballast,
Hamilton 20K,
kill a watt meter,
Lumatek,
LuXcore,
metal halide,
par,
par meter,
Phoenix 14K,
Phoenix bulb,
Power consumption,
Ushio 20K,
wattage,
watts
Sunday, January 10, 2016
PAR Readings
One of my Lumatek 250 watt dimmable ballasts went on me the other day and I replaced it with a CoralVue LuXcore 250 watt dimmable ballast. The 14K Phoenix bulbs seem to burn the same color on both ballasts but I wanted to do some testing to make sure I was still getting the same amount of PAR as my previous ballast. One thing I do like about the new ballast is that it fires the bulb up faster than the Lumatek ballast. The Phoenix bulbs that are being tested are approximately 6 months old.
Results:
Lumatek ballast:
HQI Setting - 301 watts of power draw at 775 PAR
Standard setting - 278 watts of power draw at 710 PAR
LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 261 watts of power draw at 675 PAR
Standard setting - 248 watts of power draw at 620 PAR
The PAR measurements were taken 8" under the bottom of the reflector.
I also tested my T5 supplemental lighting with two 48" ATI Pure Actinic bulbs and the power draw was 125 watts.
The light on my frag tank is a 8 bulb 48" TEK T5 Fixture. The bulb combination from front to back is as follows:
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Coral Plus
ATI Purple Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Coral Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Pure Actinic
PAR measurements were taken 8" under the fixture.
Results:
Left side the fixture the PAR was 795
the front center was 900
the back center was 795
the right side of the fixture was 665
Overall power consumption for the 8 bulbs was 489 watts. I really do miss the simmer from the metal halides but the color looks better than the display tank plus it draws less power and has higher PAR.
Results:
Lumatek ballast:
HQI Setting - 301 watts of power draw at 775 PAR
Standard setting - 278 watts of power draw at 710 PAR
LuXcore ballast:
HQI Setting - 261 watts of power draw at 675 PAR
Standard setting - 248 watts of power draw at 620 PAR
The PAR measurements were taken 8" under the bottom of the reflector.
I also tested my T5 supplemental lighting with two 48" ATI Pure Actinic bulbs and the power draw was 125 watts.
The light on my frag tank is a 8 bulb 48" TEK T5 Fixture. The bulb combination from front to back is as follows:
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Coral Plus
ATI Purple Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Coral Plus
ATI Blue Plus
ATI Pure Actinic
PAR measurements were taken 8" under the fixture.
Results:
Left side the fixture the PAR was 795
the front center was 900
the back center was 795
the right side of the fixture was 665
Overall power consumption for the 8 bulbs was 489 watts. I really do miss the simmer from the metal halides but the color looks better than the display tank plus it draws less power and has higher PAR.
Labels:
ATI,
ballast,
kill a watt meter,
Lumatek,
LuXcore,
metal halide,
par,
par meter,
Phoenix 14K,
Phoenix bulb,
Power consumption,
T5,
TEK Fixture
Tuesday, December 1, 2015
Fish Update
Here are a few pictures of some of the fish I currently have in the display.
The algae is pretty much gone from the display tank. I am now dosing 5 mL of vodka daily and the nitrates are around 1 mg/L and the phosphates are at 0.03 ppm. I am slowly ramping up the lighting period so I can add coral without the algae growing back. The algae growth in the refugium has really taken off after adding a second light and running the lights 24/7.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



























